DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION GF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN -
Docket. No.NRO2998-14
13 January 2015
Dear Ca
This is in reference to your application for correction to your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States .
Code, section 1552.
A three-member. panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your.
application on 22 October 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies, including your claim of favorable
post-service conduct. The Board also considered the documents
by the Naval Discharge Review Board.
However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
considered your civil conviction for felony domestic abuse and
drug abuse. Additionally, the Board noted that you exercised
your right to consult with counsel and to an administrative .
discharge review board. The ADB recommended separation with an
other than honorable (OTH) discharge which was approved and you
were discharged on 3 November 1998 with an OTH and RE-4
reenlistment code. -
Accordingly, your application for your request has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be. —
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
Docket No.NR02998-14
x
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
-evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
aval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
ROBERT J. ONEILL
_ Executive Director
& . OT Sincerely
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4392 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4029 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1811 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to upgrade your discharge. Consequently, .when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5460 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled regarding your misconduct and alcohol abuse, and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4958 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 31 August 1990.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR345 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2014. The Board noted that you waived the right to an ADB, your best chance for retention or a better characterization of service, and that you were fortunate to have your characterization of service upgraded to general by NDRB, since it was directed that you received an OTH discharge for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8958 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR479 14
On 11 May 2005, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4B (in-service drug use) reentry code. On 15 July 2013, the Naval Discharge Review Board denied your request to upgrade your characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5100 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7488 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.